Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared to confirm on Thursday that the Pentagon has drawn up contingency plans to seize control of Greenland and Panama by force, sparking outrage and disbelief during a congressional hearing.
Grilled repeatedly by Democrats on the House Armed Services Committee about his handling of classified military discussions on Signal chats, Hegseth declined to give direct answers — but one remark stunned lawmakers.
“Our job at the Defence Department is to have plans for any contingency,” Hegseth said in response to Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., who had pointedly asked whether the Pentagon had plans to forcibly take Greenland or Panama.
Though it’s standard for the Pentagon to prepare for hypothetical global conflicts, the defence secretary’s phrasing — and his refusal to clarify — escalated tension in the room.
Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio, asked directly: “It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct?”
But Hegseth repeated his line about contingency planning, prompting Turner to respond: “I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony.”
Hegseth responded, “We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats.”
The session, already fraught after days of stonewalling from Hegseth on various topics, quickly turned confrontational. Lawmakers pressed him on why he had used encrypted messaging apps like Signal to discuss military operations — a move some said sidestepped accountability.
“You’re an embarrassment to this country. You’re unfit to lead,” shouted Rep. Salud Carbajal, D-Calif., his voice rising. “You should just get the hell out.”
Republican lawmakers pushed back on the tone of the hearing. Several apologized to Hegseth on behalf of their colleagues, condemning what they called “flagrant disrespect.”
But Hegseth brushed off the criticism. “I’m happy to take the arrows,” he said. “We’re here to make tough calls and do what’s best for national security.”
The Pentagon has not formally commented on whether operational plans exist for such invasions.
With inputs from Associated Press