Former top Trump adviser Steve Bannon has intensified his attacks on Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, accusing him of exploiting his influence in the U.S. government while questioning the legitimacy of his immigration status. According to reports, Bannon referred to the South African-born billionaire as a “parasitic illegal immigrant” and claimed that Musk was undermining American customs and values.
The remarks come amid ongoing political tensions surrounding Musk’s increasing presence in government affairs. Since endorsing Donald Trump in June 2024, Musk has become a key figure in the administration, leading the newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Bannon, a vocal critic of Musk’s growing influence, accused him of acting like “God” and pushing drastic changes without regard for national traditions.
As per reports, Musk has denied allegations regarding his immigration status and dismissed Bannon’s remarks as “baseless attacks.” However, the controversy has sparked intense debate over Musk’s role in governance, his relationship with the Trump administration, and the effectiveness of DOGE in reducing government waste.

“Elon Musk should go back to South Africa”: Steve Bannon questions role of White South Africans in US affairs

During a recent interview, Bannon suggested that Musk may have outstayed his visa while establishing his businesses in the United States, hinting at possible legal irregularities in his residency status. While Musk has repeatedly denied such claims, Bannon insisted that Musk should “go back to South Africa,” questioning why White South Africans should have any role in U.S. affairs.
Bannon further alleged that White South Africans are “the most racist people on earth”, implying that Musk’s presence in American politics was problematic. His comments sparked immediate backlash, with many calling them divisive and controversial.

“Elon Musk an agent of Chinese influence”: Steve Bannon accuses Musk

Bannon has frequently warned against China’s growing influence over American technology and industry, and he now suggests that Musk’s close ties with Chinese officials make him a potential threat. These claims remain unsubstantiated, but they have added fuel to the ongoing scrutiny of Musk’s business and political affiliations.

Elon Musk’s role in government and leadership of DOGE

Since endorsing Trump’s re-election campaign in 2024, Musk has become one of the administration’s most influential figures. As the largest campaign donor, he has gained unprecedented access to the White House, frequently meeting with top officials.
His influence has extended beyond just financial contributions—Trump appointed Musk as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a newly established division aimed at streamlining federal operations and reducing waste.
However, Bannon has strongly opposed Musk’s involvement in government, claiming that his authority is dangerous and unearned. He warned that Musk is “acting like God” and implementing drastic changes that disregard American values and governance traditions.

Steve Bannon’s criticism of the DOGE

Bannon has also been highly critical of DOGE, arguing that the department is “merely for show” and has failed to deliver on its promises. He mocked its financial management, calling it “performative” and questioning whether the department has made any substantial cost-cutting recommendations.
He specifically criticised the lack of budget cuts from DOGE, stating:
“DOGE is sitting there with the budget, but where the f*** are the DOGE cuts? We are 30 days away from approving a budget for the entire year with $2 trillion already baked in, and not one penny of anything that DOGE found. It’s ludicrous.”

DOGE’s policy focus and Elon Musk’s leadership style

Under Musk’s leadership, DOGE has primarily focused on:

While Musk has promoted these initiatives as necessary government reforms, Bannon believes they are superficial and fail to address larger economic concerns. He insists that DOGE should be making substantial spending cuts rather than focusing on symbolic policy changes.

Reactions and political implications

Musk has largely dismissed Bannon’s accusations, calling them “unfounded” and “politically motivated.” He has denied any wrongdoing related to his immigration status and has rejected the notion that his ties to China compromise American interests.
In response to claims about DOGE’s inefficiency, Musk’s supporters argue that it is still in its early stages and needs time to implement meaningful reforms.
Bannon’s remarks have sparked a broader debate about Musk’s political involvement and the role of private sector leaders in government. Some Republicans view Musk’s contributions as valuable to Trump’s administration, while others share Bannon’s concerns about his level of influence.
The controversy surrounding Musk and DOGE is expected to play a significant role in the upcoming political landscape, as discussions about government efficiency, corporate influence, and immigration policies continue to gain traction.