The Washington Post’s decision not to endorse any candidate in the 2024 presidential election has sparked criticism and resignations, even as The Post’s leadership attempts to justify it.
The Post’s 36-year tradition of endorsing presidential candidates was reportedly called off by the billionaire owner Jeff Bezos, according to The New York Post.
The editorial page staffers had reportedly drafted an endorsement for Democratic nominee Kamala Harris over former President Donald Trump
The decision seems to have caused divisions within The Post. Veteran editorial board member Robert Kagan, a vocal Trump critic, resigned in protest. Former editor Marty Baron condemned the move as “cowardice, with democracy as its casualty,” arguing it undermines The Post’s role in holding political leaders accountable.
Critics, including some staff, have questioned Bezos’s motives, noting his vast business interests. They speculate his decision may stem from Trump’s past criticisms of Bezos and Amazon, given the company’s reliance on government contracts.
Publisher Will Lewis announced that The Washington Post would be “returning to its roots” by refraining from endorsements in this and future elections. In a note to readers, Lewis acknowledged that some might see this as “a tacit endorsement or condemnation” of one candidate over another. However, he argued that the decision reflects commitment to “integrity and courage in public service.”
Bezos, worth an estimated $209 billion, hasn’t commented publicly, fueling further speculation. Former Washington Post editor Karen Attiah voiced frustration, calling the decision “a stab in the back to all of us who value democracy.”
Numerous subscribers took to social media, with some cancelling subscriptions and accusing Bezos of prioritizing his business agenda over public service. Many commenters saw it as a betrayal of The Post’s readers, who’ve long relied on the paper for guidance on political endorsements.
This trend isn’t unique to The Post, as The Los Angeles Times also recently announced a similar policy, reportedly directed by owner Patrick Soon-Shiong.
The policy has led to resignations and raised concerns over the growing influence of wealthy media owners on editorial decisions. Critics argue these choices mark a troubling shift in how news organizations engage with democratic processes, especially during divisive times.